The New Counterculture
Gary Aldrich
Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2003
On Nov. 7, 1972, the New Left, also known as the
“Counterculture,” suffered a major defeat at the polls when Leftist
presidential candidate George McGovern lost 49 states to Richard
Nixon.
Nixon’s joy was short-lived. His re-election caused a furious
counter-reaction by the emerging Hard-Left ideologues like Hillary
Rodham Clinton. This movement, nurtured on the dreams of a
Marxist-style revolution, had to settle instead for grown-up
pragmatism that had as its basic tenet that to destroy the hated
“system,” you first had to join it.
They left the romantic Counterculture behind and moved into
positions in American institutions that would most likely provide
the corrosive powers denied them in the voting booth.
In two short years, the passion that supported a quixotic
McGovern presidential bid was used to monkey-wrench the hated Nixon
administration. They forced Nixon to resign, and American politics
has never been the same.
Republicans for their part have been unable to admit that while
they won the election in 1972, those same hate-filled political
opponents they faced were able to undermine Nixon’s popularity so
that he dropped from being a very popular president to being one of
the most hated. Most Republicans preferred to believe instead that
what had happened to Nixon was good, old-fashioned politics –
mean-spirited to be sure, but as American as apple pie.
Many also preferred to believe that the New Left simply faded
away after McGovern’s remarkable defeat, but those who persist in
believing a “warm fuzzy” fiction in spite of the facts do so to the
detriment of the Conservative Movement and the very future of this
nation as we remember it.
Conservatives were mistaken when they believed the fall of the
Soviet Union meant the defeat of worldwide Communism. Conservatives
made fighting the Cold War a foundation upon which they built a
successful movement.
Never mind that China, North Korea, Cuba and just about every
Arab nation maintained Marxist-style dictatorships. The temptation
to declare a major win and to announce that all was well was just
too good to resist. The loud clinking of champagne glasses at VIP
victory celebrations drowned out the warnings that our own homegrown
Socialists and Marxists were still very hard at work, and that they
were winning!
Burrowing deeper in our institutions, these termites never
wavered from their dreams of weakening the United States by
demonizing Capitalism, throwing out Judeo-Christian influences, and
further empowering the greedy, bureaucratic United Nations that held
for them the promise of world-wide Socialism.
In 1972, those on the Right who fancied themselves historians and
political pundits declared the New Left dead, if not buried. They
then marched off to slay other dragons and to set up guard posts on
the fronts they believed more important to the Republic.
Whatever concentration they gave to the so-called “leftover
Communism” fell on distant shores, and they ignored repeated
warnings that the New Left was not gone at all but, like the Mafia,
had decided to go “legit.”
Before and after McGovern’s defeat, Communist Party USA member
Saul D. Alinsky was mentoring a young Hillary Rodham, encouraging
her to become part of the system the Left hated so much. Hillary
took Alinsky’s advice and joined her Leftist friends on the Senate
staff of the Committee to Impeach Richard Nixon.
The Conservatives had their mentors and authors and philosophers,
too, like Ayn Rand, Russell Kirk and Milton Friedman – but the
difference was that our movement was based mostly on honestly,
self-reliance and hard work. In other words, Traditional American
Values.
But Alinsky was an accomplished liar, meaning the major component
used for victory in his movement was just the opposite – it was the
generous use of the “lie.”
Alinsky taught Hillary and thousands like her that the truth was
relative, and that truth should be used as a simple “tool” to apply
to any situation to ensure a win. Alinsky understood that if you
could not win, you would not have power to rule and make change.
Alinsky also understood that while lying was considered by most
to be unethical and unseemly, it was certainly not illegal when used
in the political theater – and after all, that was the stage upon
which they would accomplish their agenda.
In 1993, Bill Clinton became president, guided by Hillary and the
ghost of Saul Alinsky. They won the White House with only 20 years
of hard work, and enjoyed two terms in office. The political wing of
the Hard-Left finally joined the rest of the American institutions,
already corrupted by the Hard-Left termites.
From the mainstream media, to academic professors proudly
proclaiming their Marxist ideology, to a demented Hollywood in love
with the Hard-Left’s “Sex, Drugs and Rock and Roll” – everywhere you
look you can find the degrading and demeaning influences of the
Hard-Left, who simply followed the powerful political guidebook
written by Saul Alinsky.
Their best achievement has been the federal court system. When
President Bush tries to alter the course of any one of the
institutions – especially the system obviously hijacked by this very
dangerous political movement – the Alinsky-ists react in a fury
reminiscent of their post-McGovern outrage, and find a way to stop
him.
Republicans and many Conservatives continue to ignore the growing
evidence that the New Left has matured into a “Hard-Left” that even
now is beginning to worry traditional Democrats like Sen. Zell
Miller. Sen. Miller broke ranks with the Democratic Party leadership
when he wrote a book detailing his concerns.
In following the advice of political tacticians like Saul Alinsky,
the New Left Counterculture has become the Establishment in less
than 20 years. They easily elbowed out of the way the honest,
decent, patriotic Republicans – especially Conservatives who still
insist we are dealing with good old-fashioned politics rather than a
dangerous force determined to destroy forever the America that some
of us still remember.
Remarkably, the Hard-Left has also fooled their own party
faithful, the Heartland Democrats. These good people neither
comprehend, nor would they ever agree with, where Alinskyism is
taking us all.
Alinsky, being the faithful Marxist that he was, had no other
destination than outright Marxism for America; but don’t count on
the timid and gentle Republican Party to save us from this
destructive path. Apparently, the GOP would rather live in its own
lie of defeating worldwide Communism than to admit that it failed to
maintain a watch within our own borders.
Maybe the Heartland Democrats can save the day. They are not as
naive as their friends on the Conservative Right who cannot, or will
not, believe there are citizens born and raised here who for some
reason hate this country and are determined to bring it down.
I call them Alinsky’s Marxists, and Hillary Clinton could be
their queen. They are today’s mainstream – they are now “the hated
System.” And that makes those of us who know the enemy – and are
determined to fight this dishonest, debilitating and insidious
corruption – the “New Counterculture.”