Sen. John F. Kennedy, acceptance of the New York Liberal Party
Nomination, September 14, 1960:
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label "Liberal?" If
by "Liberal" they mean, as they want people to believe, someone who is
soft in his policies abroad, who is against local government, and who is
unconcerned with the taxpayer's dollar, then the record of this party
and its members demonstrate that we are not that kind of "Liberal." But
if by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind,
someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who
cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing,
their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties
-- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and
suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they
mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."
But first, I would like to say what I understand the word "Liberal" to
mean and explain in the process why I consider myself to be a "Liberal,"
and what it means in the presidential election of 1960.
In short, having set forth my view -- I hope for all time -- two nights
ago in Houston, on the proper relationship between church and state, I
want to take the opportunity to set forth my views on the proper
relationship between the state and the citizen. This is my political
credo:
I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human
liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the
source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of
our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow
citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the
liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of
fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith
in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to
increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and
freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves.
I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it
contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society
so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only
fulfill the aspirations of its citizens, but serve equally well as a
beacon for all mankind.
I do not believe in a superstate. I see no magic in tax dollars which
are sent to Washington and then returned. I abhor the waste and
incompetence of large-scale federal bureaucracies in this administration
as well as in others. I do not favor state compulsion when voluntary
individual effort can do the job and do it well. But I believe in a
government which acts, which exercises its full powers and full
responsibilities. Government is an art and a precious obligation; and
when it has a job to do, I believe it should do it. And this Requires
not only great ends but that we propose concrete means of achieving
them.
Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends.
Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention,
with political skill, and executive vigor. I believe for these reasons
that liberalism is our best and only hope in the world today. For the
liberal society is a free society, and it is at the same time and for
that reason a strong society. Its strength is drawn from the will of
free people committed to great ends and peacefully striving to meet
them. Only liberalism, in short, can repair our national power, restore
our national purpose, and liberate our national energies. And the only
basic issue in the 1960 campaign is whether our government will fall in
a conservative rut and die there, or whether we will move ahead in the
liberal spirit of daring, of breaking new ground, of doing in our
generation what Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman
and Adlai Stevenson did in their time of influence and responsibility.
Our liberalism has its roots in our diverse origins. Most of us are
descended from that segment of the American population which was once
called an immigrant minority. Today, along with our children and
grandchildren, we do not feel minor. We feel proud of our origins and we
are not second to any group in our sense of national purpose. For many
years New York represented the new frontier to all those who came from
the ends of the earth to find new opportunity and new freedom,
generations of men and women who fled from the despotism of the czars,
the horrors of the Nazis, the tyranny of hunger, who came here to the
new frontier in the State of New York. These men and women, a living
cross section of American history, indeed, a cross section of the entire
world's history of pain and hope, made of this city not only a new world
of opportunity, but a new world of the spirit as well.
Tonight we salute Governor and Senator Herbert Lehman as a symbol of
that spirit, and as a reminder that the fight for full constitutional
rights for all Americans is a fight that must be carried on in 1961.
Many of these same immigrant families produced the pioneers and builders
of the American labor movement. They are the men who sweated in our
shops, who struggled to create a union, and who were driven by longing
for education for their children and for the children's development.
They went to night schools; they built their own future, their union's
future, and their country's future, brick by brick, block by block,
neighborhood by neighborhood, and now in their children's time, suburb
by suburb.
Tonight we salute George Meany as a symbol of that struggle and as a
reminder that the fight to eliminate poverty and human exploitation is a
fight that goes on in our day. But in 1960 the cause of liberalism
cannot content itself with carrying on the fight for human justice and
economic liberalism here at home. For here and around the world the fear
of war hangs over us every morning and every night. It lies, expressed
or silent, in the minds of every American. We cannot banish it by
repeating that we are economically first or that we are militarily
first, for saying so doesn't make it so. More will be needed than
goodwill missions or talking back to Soviet politicians or increasing
the tempo of the arms race. More will be needed than good intentions,
for we know where that paving leads.
In Winston Churchill's words, "We cannot escape our dangers by recoiling
from them. We dare not pretend such dangers do not exist."
And tonight we salute Adlai Stevenson as an eloquent spokesman for the
effort to achieve an intelligent foreign policy. Our opponents would
like the people to believe that in a time of danger it would be
hazardous to change the administration that has brought us to this time
of danger.
I think it would be hazardous not to change. I think it would be
hazardous to continue four more years of stagnation and indifference
here at home and abroad, of starving the underpinnings of our national
power, including not only our defense but our image abroad as a friend.
This is an important election -- in many ways as important as any this
century -- and I think that the Democratic Party and the Liberal Party
here in New York, and those who believe in progress all over the United
States, should be associated with us in this great effort.
The reason that Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman
and Adlai Stevenson had influence abroad, and the United States in their
time had it, was because they moved this country here at home, because
they stood for something here in the United States, for expanding the
benefits of our society to our own people, and the people around the
world looked to us as a symbol of hope.
I think it is our task to re-create the same atmosphere in our own time.
Our national elections have often proved to be the turning point in the
course of our country. I am proposing that 1960 be another turning point
in the history of the great Republic.
Some pundits are saying it's 1928 all over again. I say it's 1932 all
over again. I say this is the great opportunity that we will have in our
time to move our people and this country and the people of the free
world beyond the new frontiers of the 1960s.
|