Editor's note: Recently, WND Managing Editor David Kupelian,
author of the best-selling book, "The Marketing of Evil," was
widely
quoted in the news media for his criticism of the new film "Brokeback
Mountain." Here, Kupelian explains how and why the
controversial movie is one of the most powerful homosexual
propaganda films of our time.
"Brokeback Mountain," the controversial "gay cowboy" film
that has garnered seven Golden Globe nominations and breathless
media reviews and has now emerged as a front-runner for the
Oscars is a brilliant propaganda film, reportedly causing
viewers to change the way they feel about homosexual
relationships and same-sex marriage.
And how do the movie-makers pull off such a dazzling feat?
Simple. They do it by raping the "Marlboro Man," that revered
American symbol of rugged individualism and masculinity.
We all know the Marlboro Man. In
"The
Marketing of Evil," I show how the Philip Morris Company
made marketing history by taking one of the most positive
American images of all time the cowboy and attaching it to a
negative, death-oriented product cigarettes.
Hit the pause button for a moment so this idea can completely
sink in: Cigarette marketers cleverly attached, in the public's
mind, two utterly unrelated things: 1) the American cowboy, with
all of the powerful feelings that image evokes in us, of
independence, self-confidence, wide-open spaces and authentic
Americanism, and 2) cigarettes, a stinky, health-destroying
waste of money. This legendary advertising campaign targeting
men succeeded in transforming market underdog Marlboro (up until
then, sold as a women's cigarette with the slogan "Mild as May")
into the world's best-selling cigarette.
It was all part of the modern marketing revolution, which
meant that, instead of touting a product's actual benefits,
marketers instead would psychologically manipulate the public by
associating their product with the fulfillment of people's
deepest, unconscious needs and desires. (Want to sell liquor?
Put a seductive woman in the ad.) Obviously, the marketers could
never actually deliver on that promise but emotional
manipulation sure is an effective way to sell a lot of products.
The "Marlboro Man" campaign launched 50 years ago. Today, the
powerful cowboy image is being used to sell us on another
self-destructive product: homosexual sex and "gay" marriage.
'People's minds have been changed'
In "Brokeback Mountain," a film adaptation of the 1997 New
Yorker short story by Annie Proulx, two 19-year-old ranchers
named Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) and Jack Twist (Jake
Gyllenhaal) have been hired to guard sheep on a rugged mountain
in 1963 Wyoming. One night, the bitter cold drives Ennis into
Jack's tent so they can keep each other warm. As they lie there,
suddenly and almost without warning, these two young men both
of whom later insist they're not "queer" jump out of the sack
and awkwardly and violently engage in anal sex.
Too embarrassed the next morning even to talk about it, Ennis
and Jack dismiss their sexual encounter as a "one-shot deal" and
part company at the end of the sheepherding job. Ennis marries
his fiancιe Alma (Michelle Williams, Ledger's real-life
girlfriend) while Jack marries female rodeo rider and prom queen
Lureen (Anne Hathaway). Each family has children.
Four years later, Jack sends Ennis a postcard saying he's
coming to town for a visit. When the moment finally arrives,
Ennis, barely able to contain his anticipation, rushes outside
to meet Jack and the two men passionately embrace and kiss.
Ennis's wife sadly witnesses everything through the screen door.
(Since this is one of the film's sadder moments, I wasn't quite
sure why the audience in the Portland, Oregon, theater burst out
in laughter at Alma's heartbreaking realization.)
From that point on, over the next two decades Ennis and Jack
take off together on periodic "fishing trips" at Brokeback
Mountain, where no fishing actually takes place. During these
adulterous homosexual affairs, Jack suggests they buy a ranch
where the two can live happily ever after, presumably abandoning
their wives and children. Ennis, however, is afraid, haunted by
a traumatic childhood memory: It seems his father had tried to
inoculate him against homosexuality by taking him to see the
brutalized, castrated, dead body of a rancher who had lived
together with another man until murderous, bigoted neighbors
committed the gruesome hate crime.
Eventually, life with Ennis becomes intolerable and Alma
divorces him, while Lureen, absorbed with the family business,
only suspects Jack's secret as they drift further and further
apart. When, toward the end of the story, Jack dies in a freak
accident (his wife tells Ennis a tire blew up while Jack was
changing it, propelling the hubcap into his face and killing
him), Ennis wonders whether Jack actually met the same brutal
fate as the castrated "gay" cowboy of his youth.
Ultimately, Ennis ends up alone, with nothing, living in a
small, secluded trailer, having lost both his family and his
homosexual partner. He's comforted only by his most precious
possession Jack's shirt which he pitifully embraces, almost
in a slow dance, his aching loneliness masterfully projected
into the audience via the film's artistry.
Yes, the talents of Hollywood's finest are brought together
in a successful attempt at making us experience Ennis's
suffering, supposedly inflicted by a homophobic society. Heath
Ledger's performance is brilliant and devastating. We do indeed
leave the theater feeling Ennis's pain. Mission accomplished.
Lost in all of this, however, are towering, life-and-death
realities concerning sex and morality and the sanctity of
marriage and the preciousness of children and the direction of
our civilization itself. So please, you moviemakers, how about
easing off that tight camera shot of Ennis's suffering and doing
a slow pan over the massive wreckage all around him? What about
the years of silent anguish and loneliness Alma stoically
endures for the sake of keeping her family together, or the
terrible betrayal, suffering and tears of the children, bereft
of a father? None of this merits more than a brief
acknowledgment in "Brokeback Mountain."
What is important to the moviemakers, rather, is that the
viewer be made to feel, and feel, and feel again as deeply as
possible the exquisitely painful loneliness and heartache of the
homosexual cowboys denied their truest happiness because of an
ignorant and homophobic society.
Thus are the Judeo-Christian moral values that formed the
very foundation and substance of Western culture for the past
three millennia all swept away on a delicious tide of
manufactured emotion. And believe me, skilled directors and
actors can manufacture emotion by the truckload. It's what they
do for a living.
Co-star Jake Gyllenhaal realized the movie's power to
transform audiences in Toronto, where, according to
Entertainment magazine, "he was approached by festival-goers
proclaiming that their preconceptions had been shattered by the
film's insistence on humanizing gay love."
"Brokeback Mountain," said Gyllenhaal, "is that pure place
you take someone that's free of judgment. These guys were
scared. What they feared was not each other but what was outside
of each other. What was so sad was that it didn't have to happen
like that." But then, said the article, Gyllenhaal jumped to his
feel and exclaimed triumphantly: "I mean, people's minds have
been changed. That's amazing."
Changed indeed. And that's the goal. Film is, by its very
nature, highly propagandistic. That is, when you read a book, if
you detect you're being lied to or manipulated, you can always
stop reading, close the book momentarily and say, "Wait just a
minute, there's something wrong here!" You can't do that in a
film: You're bombarded with sound and images, all expertly
crafted to give you selected information and to stimulate
certain feelings, and you can't stop the barrage, not in a
theater anyway. The visuals and sound and music and along with
them, the underlying agenda of the filmmakers pursue you
relentlessly, overwhelming your emotions and senses.
And when you leave the theater, unless you're really
objective to what you've experienced, you've been changed even
if just a little bit.
Want to know how easily your feelings can be manipulated?
Let's take the smallest, most seemingly insignificant example
and see. Sit down at a piano and play a song, any song even
"Mary Had a Little Lamb" as long as it's in a major key. Then,
play the same song, but change from a major to a minor key; just
lower the third step of the scale by a half-step so the melody
and harmony become minor. If you watch carefully, you'll note
this one tiny change makes the minor-key version sound a bit
melancholy and sad, while the normal, major-key version sounds
bright and happy. (As the expression goes, "Major glad, minor
sad.")
Now take this principle and apply it to a feature film by
expanding it a million-fold. A movie's musical score has one
overriding function to make the viewer feel a certain
way at strategic points during the story. And music is just one
of dozens of factors and techniques used to influence audiences
in the deepest way possible. Everything from the script to the
directing to the camera work to the acting, which in "Brokeback
Mountain" is brilliant, serve the purpose of making the
movie-makers' vision seem like reality even if it's twisted
and perverse.
Do we understand that Hollywood could easily produce a
similar movie to "Brokeback Mountain," only this time glorifying
an incest relationship, or even an adult-child sexual
relationship? Like "Brokeback," it too would serve to
desensitize us to the immoral and destructive reality of what
we're seeing, while fervently coaxing us into embracing that
which we once rightly shunned.
All the filmmakers would need to do is skillfully make
viewers experience the actors' powerful emotions of loneliness
and emptiness juxtaposed with feelings of joy and fulfillment
when the two "lovers" are together to bring us to a new level
of "understanding" for any forbidden "love." Alongside this, of
course, they would necessarily portray those opposed to this
unorthodox "love" as Nazis or thugs. Thus, many of us would let
go of our "old-fashioned" biblical ideas of morality in light of
what seems like the more imminent and undeniable reality of
human love in all its diverse forms.
A "Brokeback"-type movie could easily be made, for instance,
to portray a female school teacher's affair with a 14-year-old
student as "a magnificent love story." And I'm not talking about
the 2000 made-for-TV potboiler, "All-American Girl: The Mary Kay
Letourneau Story," about the Seattle school teacher who seduced
a sixth-grade student, went to prison for statutory rape, and
later married the boy having had two children by him. I'm
talking about a big-budget, big-name Hollywood masterpiece aimed
at transforming America through film, just as Hitler relied on
master filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl to make propaganda films to
manipulate the emotions of an entire nation.
In place of "Brokeback Mountain's" scene with the castrated
homosexual, the "adult-child love story" could have a similar
scene in which, as a young girl, the future teacher's mother
took her to see the body of a woman who had fallen in consensual
"love" with a 14-year-old boy, only to be brutalized, her
breasts cut off, and bludgeoned to death all by Nazi-like
bigoted neighbors. (So that's why she couldn't be honest
and open about her later relationship with her student.)
Inevitably, such a film would make us doubt our former
condemnation of adult-child sex, or at least reduce our outrage
as we gained more "understanding" and sympathy for the
participants. It would cause us to ask the same question one
reviewer asked after seeing "Brokeback Mountain": "In an age
when the fight over gay marriage still rages, 'Brokeback
Mountain,' the tale of two men who are scarcely even allowed to
imagine being together, asks, through the very purity with which
it touches us: When it comes to love, what sort of world do we
really want?"
OK, I'll bite. Let's talk about love. The critics call
"Brokeback Mountain" a "pure" and "magnificent" love story. Do
we really want to call such an obsession especially one that
destroys marriages and is based on constant lies, deceit and
neglect of one's children "love"?
What if I were a heroin addict and told you I loved my drug
dealer? What if I told you he always makes me feel good, and
that I have a hard time living without him, and that I think
about him all the time with warm feelings of anticipation and
inner completion? And that whenever we get together, it's the
only time I feel truly happy and at peace with myself?
Oh, you don't approve of my "love"? You dare to criticize it,
telling me my relationship with my drug dealer is not real love,
but just an unhealthy addiction? What if I respond to you by
saying, "Oh shut up, you hater. How dare you impose your
sick, narrow-minded, oppressive values on me? Who are you,
you pinch-faced, moralistic hypocrite, to define for me
what real love is?"
Don't laugh. I guarantee Hollywood could make a movie about a
man and his drug dealer, or an adult-child sexual relationship,
that would pull on our emotions and create some level of
sympathy for the characters. Furthermore, in at least some
cases, it would make us doubt our conscience a gift directly
from God, the perception of right and wrong that he puts in each
one of us our inner knowing that this was a totally unhealthy
and self-destructive relationship.
Ultimately, propaganda works because it washes over us,
overwhelming our senses, confusing us, upsetting or
emotionalizing us, and thereby making us doubt what we once
knew. Listen to what actor Jake Gyllenhaal, who plays Jack, told
the reporter for Entertainment magazine about doing the "love"
scenes with Heath Ledger:
"I was super uncomfortable [but] what made me most
courageous was that I realized I had to try to let go of that
stereotype I had in my mind, that bit of homophobia, and try for
a second to be vulnerable and sensitive. It was f---in' hard,
man. I succeeded only for milliseconds."
Gyllenhaal thinks he was "super
uncomfortable" while being filmed having simulated homosexual
sex because of his own "homophobia." Could it be, rather, that
his conflict resulted from putting himself in a position, having
agreed to do the film, where he was required to violate his own
conscience? As so often happens, he was tricked into pushing
past invisible internal barriers crossing a line he wasn't
meant to cross. It's called seduction.
This is how the "marketers of evil" work on all of us. They
transform our attitudes by making us feel as though our "super
uncomfortable" feelings toward embracing unnatural or corrupt
behavior of whatever sort a discomfort literally put into us
by a loving God, for our protection somehow represent
ignorance or bigotry or weakness.
I wrote "The Marketing of Evil" to expose these people, and
especially to reveal the hidden techniques they've been using
for decades to confuse us, to manipulate our feelings and get us
to doubt and turn our backs on the truth we once knew and loved.
Indeed, whether they're outright lying to us, or ridiculing us
for our traditional beliefs, or trying to make us feel guilty
over some supposed bigotry on our part, the "marketers of evil"
can prevail simply by intimidating or emotionally stirring us up
in one way or another. Once that happens, we can easily become
confused and lose the inborn understanding God gave us. We all
need that inner understanding or common sense, because it's our
primary protection from all the evil influences in this world.
As I said at the outset, Hollywood has now raped the Marlboro
Man. It has taken a revered symbol of America the cowboy
with all the powerful emotions and associations that are rooted
deep down in the pioneering American soul, and grafted onto it a
self-destructive lifestyle it wants to force down Americans'
throats. The result is a brazen propaganda vehicle designed to
replace the reservations most Americans still have toward
homosexuality with powerful feelings of sympathy, guilt over
past "homophobia" and ultimately the complete and utter
acceptance of homosexuality as equivalent in every way to
heterosexuality.
If and when that day comes, America will have totally
abandoned its core biblical principles as well as the Author
of those principles. The radical secularists will have gotten
their wish, and this nation like the traditional cowboy
characters corrupted in "Brokeback Mountain" will have
stumbled down a sad, self-destructive and ultimately disastrous
road.